<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Discussion on Polyamory / People With More Than One Romantic Partner</title>
	<atom:link href="http://elizabethslittleblog.wordpress.com/2007/07/08/the-discussion-on-polyamory-people-with-more-than-one-romantic-partner/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://elizabethslittleblog.wordpress.com/2007/07/08/the-discussion-on-polyamory-people-with-more-than-one-romantic-partner/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 28 Dec 2009 02:45:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Susie Bright on Polyamory &#171; Elizabeth&#8217;s Little Blog</title>
		<link>http://elizabethslittleblog.wordpress.com/2007/07/08/the-discussion-on-polyamory-people-with-more-than-one-romantic-partner/#comment-13918</link>
		<dc:creator>Susie Bright on Polyamory &#171; Elizabeth&#8217;s Little Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jan 2008 18:10:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://elizabethslittleblog.wordpress.com/2007/07/08/the-discussion-on-polyamory-people-with-more-than-one-romantic-partner/#comment-13918</guid>
		<description>[...] and I don&#8217;t want to reignite some sort of dramatic blogosphere discussion (as happenend in July). But I did want to point out Susie Bright&#8217;s recent posting on polyamory, &#8220;Peppermint, [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] and I don&#8217;t want to reignite some sort of dramatic blogosphere discussion (as happenend in July). But I did want to point out Susie Bright&#8217;s recent posting on polyamory, &#8220;Peppermint, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Strange Credibility of Polyamory &#171; freaksexual</title>
		<link>http://elizabethslittleblog.wordpress.com/2007/07/08/the-discussion-on-polyamory-people-with-more-than-one-romantic-partner/#comment-12302</link>
		<dc:creator>The Strange Credibility of Polyamory &#171; freaksexual</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Nov 2007 07:31:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://elizabethslittleblog.wordpress.com/2007/07/08/the-discussion-on-polyamory-people-with-more-than-one-romantic-partner/#comment-12302</guid>
		<description>[...] positive attitude seems to be replicated in most left-wing discussions of polyamory, for example among Unitarians, in Pagan circles, and in queer communities (though BDSM is also generally accepted in the LGBT [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] positive attitude seems to be replicated in most left-wing discussions of polyamory, for example among Unitarians, in Pagan circles, and in queer communities (though BDSM is also generally accepted in the LGBT [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mskitty</title>
		<link>http://elizabethslittleblog.wordpress.com/2007/07/08/the-discussion-on-polyamory-people-with-more-than-one-romantic-partner/#comment-4019</link>
		<dc:creator>mskitty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jul 2007 13:26:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://elizabethslittleblog.wordpress.com/2007/07/08/the-discussion-on-polyamory-people-with-more-than-one-romantic-partner/#comment-4019</guid>
		<description>My stance on this so far has been that if I were asked, as a minister,  to sanctify a polyamorous relationship, I would not do so.  My reason for this stance is that I simply do not know of poly relationships which are longtime and successful.  I have no personal acquaintance with poly families (at least as far as I know now), though I know one couple with children which calls itself a poly family and is looking for another mate.

What I have seen is nonmonogamous men/women who want their mates to sanction their extramarital sexual relationship(s).  

I am dubious about the success rate of poly relationships.  I would not be in favor of a public statement championing the legalization of poly marriages.  I don&#039;t think it&#039;s the same thing as same-sex marriage.   There is a lot of evidence that same sex marriages are successful and longterm and good for children.  There is not that same body of evidence, as far as I can tell, for poly marriage.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My stance on this so far has been that if I were asked, as a minister,  to sanctify a polyamorous relationship, I would not do so.  My reason for this stance is that I simply do not know of poly relationships which are longtime and successful.  I have no personal acquaintance with poly families (at least as far as I know now), though I know one couple with children which calls itself a poly family and is looking for another mate.</p>
<p>What I have seen is nonmonogamous men/women who want their mates to sanction their extramarital sexual relationship(s).  </p>
<p>I am dubious about the success rate of poly relationships.  I would not be in favor of a public statement championing the legalization of poly marriages.  I don&#8217;t think it&#8217;s the same thing as same-sex marriage.   There is a lot of evidence that same sex marriages are successful and longterm and good for children.  There is not that same body of evidence, as far as I can tell, for poly marriage.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: the Lively Traditionalist</title>
		<link>http://elizabethslittleblog.wordpress.com/2007/07/08/the-discussion-on-polyamory-people-with-more-than-one-romantic-partner/#comment-4007</link>
		<dc:creator>the Lively Traditionalist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jul 2007 05:08:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://elizabethslittleblog.wordpress.com/2007/07/08/the-discussion-on-polyamory-people-with-more-than-one-romantic-partner/#comment-4007</guid>
		<description>I call the distinction you make between how we treat folks in multi-partnered relationships in our congregation and whether we should think those relationships should be legalized etc. as the difference between the pastoral and public ministry.  It&#039;s an important distinction, but the two spheres overlap at some point.  Do you say that 3-person relationships are as &quot;socially beneficial&quot;, or &quot;morally equivalent&quot;, or &quot;just as good as&quot; 2-person relationships, even if all you doing is talking within the congregation?  Once your pastoral support for people in 3-person relationships includes general statements validating those relationships, you have moved into another kind of ministry, one that I very reluctant to do.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I call the distinction you make between how we treat folks in multi-partnered relationships in our congregation and whether we should think those relationships should be legalized etc. as the difference between the pastoral and public ministry.  It&#8217;s an important distinction, but the two spheres overlap at some point.  Do you say that 3-person relationships are as &#8220;socially beneficial&#8221;, or &#8220;morally equivalent&#8221;, or &#8220;just as good as&#8221; 2-person relationships, even if all you doing is talking within the congregation?  Once your pastoral support for people in 3-person relationships includes general statements validating those relationships, you have moved into another kind of ministry, one that I very reluctant to do.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
